Where to Live in Glarus as a Young Professional

By VivaMap · find the best place to live in Switzerland, from canton to exact address · Last updated 14 September 2026

Quality-of-life map for the Young Professional profile in the Glarus area — communes weighted by that profile's priorities

The Glarus metropolitan area shows mixed results for the Young Professional profile. Our analysis covers 2 communes in the Glarus area.

With an average score of 4.5/10, the area is on par with the national average (4.7/10). Individual scores range from 3.8 to 5.1/10, offering a real span of options. A standard deviation of 0.62 signals relative homogeneity for this profile.

Top 5 Communes

  1. 1. Glarus Nord (GL) 5.1/10
    solid score for this profile, without marked excellence
  2. 2. Glarus (GL) 3.8/10
    modest score, worth comparing with other options

Bottom 5 Communes

  1. 1. Glarus (GL) 3.8/10
    modest score, worth comparing with other options
  2. 2. Glarus Nord (GL) 5.1/10
    solid score for this profile, without marked excellence

Why These Communes Stand Out

Public Transport (weight: 95%)

Below-average average of 2.7/10. Glarus Nord leads the ranking (5.3/10), while Glarus comes last (0/10). Note: Glarus appears in the global top 5 for the Young Professional profile despite a low score here — its advantage comes from other criteria.

Nightlife & Dining (weight: 90%)

Below-average average of 2.8/10. Glarus Nord leads the ranking (2.8/10), while Glarus comes last (2.8/10). Note: Glarus appears in the global top 5 for the Young Professional profile despite a low score here — its advantage comes from other criteria.

Taxation (weight: 60%)

Below-average average of 4.1/10. Glarus leads the ranking (4.3/10), while Glarus Nord comes last (3.8/10). Note: Glarus Nord appears in the global top 5 for the Young Professional profile despite a low score here — its advantage comes from other criteria.

Strengths and Tradeoffs of the Agglomeration

Relative to the Swiss average, the Glarus area stands out on Air Quality (8.4/10, well above the national average of 6.3/10, deviation +2) and shows weakness on Annual Sunshine (1.2/10, well below the national average of 4.7/10, deviation -3.5).

Top-ranked communes limit the compromise on Annual Sunshine without sacrificing higher-priority profile criteria. Each criterion's scores are independently normalised at national scale; direct comparison between different criteria should be interpreted with caution.

Advice for the Young Professional profile

For a young professional, prioritise frequency — not just presence — of public transport: a station with hourly service is not equivalent to a metro every 5 minutes. Also look at the density of restaurants, bars, and co-working spaces within 10 minutes on foot. Assess the rent-versus-quality-of-life ratio: top-ranked communes for this profile are often the most expensive. Project 3–5 years ahead: a lively neighbourhood that appeals at 28 can weigh at 33 with a child. This profile is the most sensitive to the urban-versus-suburban tradeoff.

Methodology

The profile overall score combines the 9 VivaMap criteria weighted by the profile's declared priorities. Each criterion score is normalised on a national 0-10 scale to keep agglomerations comparable. Visit the criteria pages to learn how each dimension is measured.

Related Guides

Data: FSO, geo.admin.ch, OSM — Scores normalised 0-10