Noise in Lausanne: best neighborhoods and areas

By VivaMap · find the best place to live in Switzerland, from canton to exact address · Last updated 14 September 2026

Map of Noise scores across the Lausanne area — top-ranked communes in green, weakest in red, per VivaMap methodology

The Noise criterion evaluates chronic sound exposure: road, rail, air, and industrial noise. It draws on the FOEN SonBase model and the BAZL air-noise cadastre. A high score means a calm environment, conducive to sleep and concentration.

On this criterion, the Lausanne area underperforms. The average score of 8.3/10, computed across 76 communes, sits below the national average (8.9/10). Scores span from 2.8/10 to 10/10 across the communes analysed.

The standard deviation of 1.7 signals significant internal disparities: commune choice matters as much as agglomeration choice.

Top 5 Communes

  1. 1. Granges (Veveyse) (FR) 10.0/10
    outstanding score, well above the Swiss national average
  2. 2. Senarclens (VD) 10.0/10
    outstanding score, well above the Swiss national average
  3. 3. Cugy (VD) 10.0/10
    outstanding score, well above the Swiss national average
  4. 4. Echallens (VD) 10.0/10
    outstanding score, well above the Swiss national average
  5. 5. Froideville (VD) 10.0/10
    outstanding score, well above the Swiss national average

Bottom 5 Communes

  1. 1. Chavannes-près-Renens (VD) 2.8/10
    modest performance, below the national average
  2. 2. Villars-Sainte-Croix (VD) 3.8/10
    modest performance, below the national average
  3. 3. Tolochenaz (VD) 4.6/10
    solid performance, close to the Swiss average
  4. 4. Mex (VD) 4.6/10
    solid performance, close to the Swiss average
  5. 5. Crissier (VD) 4.9/10
    solid performance, close to the Swiss average

Geographic Patterns and Contrasts

Between the top-ranked commune (10/10) and the weakest (2.8/10), the gap reaches 7.2 points out of 10. A meaningful divide that illustrates how fine-grained geography shapes this criterion: a neighbouring commune can deliver a radically different experience.

Top-ranked communes typically benefit from several convergent factors (location, long-standing infrastructure, geographic exposure); the weakest often compound structural disadvantages. The interactive map makes these spatial clusters visible at a glance.

Who Weighs This Criterion Most

Among the four VivaMap profiles, the Nature profile weights this criterion most heavily (weight 95 out of 100). The other profiles apply the following weights: Family (weight 90), Retirement (weight 90), Young Professional (weight 30).

Practically, a high Noise score carries significant impact on the ranking for the Nature profile, whereas it matters less for a profile that de-emphasises this criterion. This explains why the same commune can lead one ranking and fall mid-pack in another.

Comparison Across Swiss Agglomerations

Among the 21 major Swiss agglomerations analysed by VivaMap, Lausanne lands in last place for Noise — rank 17/21 (ahead of 24% of the agglomerations).

Its immediate neighbours in the ranking are Bern (rank 16) and Winterthur (rank 18). This context helps calibrate absolute scores: an agglomeration that looks average in isolation can sit well among its peers, and vice versa.

Key Takeaway

To prioritise Noise in the Lausanne area, Granges (Veveyse) (FR) leads with 10/10. Explore the interactive map to compare communes in real time, adjust weights to your profile, and see variation at the neighbourhood scale. See the national Noise page for the full ranking and methodology.

Related Guides

Data: FSO, geo.admin.ch, OSM — Scores normalised 0-10