Nature & Green Spaces in Chur: best neighborhoods and areas

By VivaMap · find the best place to live in Switzerland, from canton to exact address · Last updated 14 September 2026

Map of Nature & Green Spaces scores across the Chur area — top-ranked communes in green, weakest in red, per VivaMap methodology

Nature & Green Spaces combines vegetation cover (60%) and built-environment openness (40%). It measures both the presence of parks and forests and the airiness of the built fabric. A high score denotes a green, breathable setting.

On this criterion, the Chur area shows average results. The average score of 9.5/10, computed across 10 communes, sits on par with the national average (9.1/10). Scores span from 8.9/10 to 9.8/10 across the communes analysed.

The standard deviation of 0.3 signals relative homogeneity; results are comparable from one commune to the next.

Top 5 Communes

  1. 1. Domleschg (GR) 9.8/10
    outstanding score, well above the Swiss national average
  2. 2. Tamins (GR) 9.7/10
    outstanding score, well above the Swiss national average
  3. 3. Churwalden (GR) 9.7/10
    outstanding score, well above the Swiss national average
  4. 4. Trimmis (GR) 9.7/10
    outstanding score, well above the Swiss national average
  5. 5. Untervaz (GR) 9.6/10
    outstanding score, well above the Swiss national average

Bottom 5 Communes

  1. 1. Zizers (GR) 8.9/10
    outstanding score, well above the Swiss national average
  2. 2. Felsberg (GR) 9.1/10
    outstanding score, well above the Swiss national average
  3. 3. Chur (GR) 9.2/10
    outstanding score, well above the Swiss national average
  4. 4. Domat/Ems (GR) 9.3/10
    outstanding score, well above the Swiss national average
  5. 5. Rothenbrunnen (GR) 9.5/10
    outstanding score, well above the Swiss national average

Geographic Patterns and Contrasts

With a spread of only 0.9 points between extremes (9.8/10 to 8.9/10), the Chur communes offer relatively uniform conditions on this criterion.

Top-ranked communes typically benefit from several convergent factors (location, long-standing infrastructure, geographic exposure); the weakest often compound structural disadvantages. The interactive map makes these spatial clusters visible at a glance.

Who Weighs This Criterion Most

Among the four VivaMap profiles, the Nature profile weights this criterion most heavily (weight 100 out of 100). The other profiles apply the following weights: Retirement (weight 95), Family (weight 80), Young Professional (weight 30).

Practically, a high Nature & Green Spaces score carries significant impact on the ranking for the Nature profile, whereas it matters less for a profile that de-emphasises this criterion. This explains why the same commune can lead one ranking and fall mid-pack in another.

Comparison Across Swiss Agglomerations

Among the 21 major Swiss agglomerations analysed by VivaMap, Chur ranks among the top three for Nature & Green Spaces — rank 2/21 (ahead of 95% of the agglomerations).

Its immediate neighbours in the ranking are Delémont (rank 1) and Glarus (rank 3). This context helps calibrate absolute scores: an agglomeration that looks average in isolation can sit well among its peers, and vice versa.

Key Takeaway

To prioritise Nature & Green Spaces in the Chur area, Domleschg (GR) leads with 9.8/10. Explore the interactive map to compare communes in real time, adjust weights to your profile, and see variation at the neighbourhood scale. See the national Nature & Green Spaces page for the full ranking and methodology.

Related Guides

Data: FSO, geo.admin.ch, OSM — Scores normalised 0-10