Nature & Green Spaces in Bern: best neighborhoods and areas

By VivaMap · find the best place to live in Switzerland, from canton to exact address · Last updated 16 June 2026

Map of Nature & Green Spaces scores across the Bern area — top-ranked communes in green, weakest in red, per VivaMap methodology

Nature & Green Spaces combines vegetation cover (60%) and built-environment openness (40%). It measures both the presence of parks and forests and the airiness of the built fabric. A high score denotes a green, breathable setting.

On this criterion, the Bern area performs particularly well. The average score of 9.2/10, computed across 85 communes, sits on par with the national average (9.1/10). Scores span from 7.1/10 to 9.7/10 across the communes analysed.

The standard deviation of 0.6 signals relative homogeneity; results are comparable from one commune to the next.

Top 5 Communes

  1. 1. Radelfingen (BE) 9.7/10
    outstanding score, well above the Swiss national average
  2. 2. Oberbalm (BE) 9.7/10
    outstanding score, well above the Swiss national average
  3. 3. Landiswil (BE) 9.7/10
    outstanding score, well above the Swiss national average
  4. 4. Oberthal (BE) 9.7/10
    outstanding score, well above the Swiss national average
  5. 5. Riggisberg (BE) 9.7/10
    outstanding score, well above the Swiss national average

Bottom 5 Communes

  1. 1. Ittigen (BE) 7.1/10
    strong performance, above the national average
  2. 2. Bern (BE) 7.1/10
    strong performance, above the national average
  3. 3. Ostermundigen (BE) 7.6/10
    strong performance, above the national average
  4. 4. Bremgarten bei Bern (BE) 7.7/10
    strong performance, above the national average
  5. 5. Muri bei Bern (BE) 7.8/10
    strong performance, above the national average

Geographic Patterns and Contrasts

With a spread of only 2.6 points between extremes (9.7/10 to 7.1/10), the Bern communes offer relatively uniform conditions on this criterion.

Top-ranked communes typically benefit from several convergent factors (location, long-standing infrastructure, geographic exposure); the weakest often compound structural disadvantages. The interactive map makes these spatial clusters visible at a glance.

Who Weighs This Criterion Most

Among the four VivaMap profiles, the Nature profile weights this criterion most heavily (weight 100 out of 100). The other profiles apply the following weights: Retirement (weight 95), Family (weight 80), Young Professional (weight 30).

Practically, a high Nature & Green Spaces score carries significant impact on the ranking for the Nature profile, whereas it matters less for a profile that de-emphasises this criterion. This explains why the same commune can lead one ranking and fall mid-pack in another.

Comparison Across Swiss Agglomerations

Among the 21 major Swiss agglomerations analysed by VivaMap, Bern sits in the upper half for Nature & Green Spaces — rank 7/21 (ahead of 71% of the agglomerations).

Its immediate neighbours in the ranking are Frauenfeld (rank 6) and Thun (rank 8). This context helps calibrate absolute scores: an agglomeration that looks average in isolation can sit well among its peers, and vice versa.

Key Takeaway

To prioritise Nature & Green Spaces in the Bern area, Radelfingen (BE) leads with 9.7/10. Explore the interactive map to compare communes in real time, adjust weights to your profile, and see variation at the neighbourhood scale. See the national Nature & Green Spaces page for the full ranking and methodology.

Related Guides

Data: FSO, geo.admin.ch, OSM — Scores normalised 0-10