Nature & Green Spaces in Basel: best neighborhoods and areas

By VivaMap · find the best place to live in Switzerland, from canton to exact address · Last updated 26 July 2026

Map of Nature & Green Spaces scores across the Basel area — top-ranked communes in green, weakest in red, per VivaMap methodology

Nature & Green Spaces combines vegetation cover (60%) and built-environment openness (40%). It measures both the presence of parks and forests and the airiness of the built fabric. A high score denotes a green, breathable setting.

On this criterion, the Basel area underperforms. The average score of 8.5/10, computed across 59 communes, sits below the national average (9.1/10). Scores span from 3.6/10 to 9.7/10 across the communes analysed.

The standard deviation of 1.2 signals moderate variation between communes, enough to warrant a careful comparison.

Top 5 Communes

  1. 1. Seewen (SO) 9.7/10
    outstanding score, well above the Swiss national average
  2. 2. Burg im Leimental (BL) 9.7/10
    outstanding score, well above the Swiss national average
  3. 3. Gempen (SO) 9.6/10
    outstanding score, well above the Swiss national average
  4. 4. Metzerlen-Mariastein (SO) 9.6/10
    outstanding score, well above the Swiss national average
  5. 5. Himmelried (SO) 9.6/10
    outstanding score, well above the Swiss national average

Bottom 5 Communes

  1. 1. Basel (BS) 3.6/10
    modest performance, below the national average
  2. 2. Birsfelden (BL) 5.4/10
    solid performance, close to the Swiss average
  3. 3. Binningen (BL) 5.8/10
    solid performance, close to the Swiss average
  4. 4. Bottmingen (BL) 6.7/10
    strong performance, above the national average
  5. 5. Münchenstein (BL) 6.9/10
    strong performance, above the national average

Geographic Patterns and Contrasts

Between the top-ranked commune (9.7/10) and the weakest (3.6/10), the gap reaches 6.1 points out of 10. A meaningful divide that illustrates how fine-grained geography shapes this criterion: a neighbouring commune can deliver a radically different experience.

Top-ranked communes typically benefit from several convergent factors (location, long-standing infrastructure, geographic exposure); the weakest often compound structural disadvantages. The interactive map makes these spatial clusters visible at a glance.

Who Weighs This Criterion Most

Among the four VivaMap profiles, the Nature profile weights this criterion most heavily (weight 100 out of 100). The other profiles apply the following weights: Retirement (weight 95), Family (weight 80), Young Professional (weight 30).

Practically, a high Nature & Green Spaces score carries significant impact on the ranking for the Nature profile, whereas it matters less for a profile that de-emphasises this criterion. This explains why the same commune can lead one ranking and fall mid-pack in another.

Comparison Across Swiss Agglomerations

Among the 21 major Swiss agglomerations analysed by VivaMap, Basel lands in last place for Nature & Green Spaces — rank 18/21 (ahead of 19% of the agglomerations).

Its immediate neighbours in the ranking are Zurich (rank 17) and Lausanne (rank 19). This context helps calibrate absolute scores: an agglomeration that looks average in isolation can sit well among its peers, and vice versa.

Key Takeaway

To prioritise Nature & Green Spaces in the Basel area, Seewen (SO) leads with 9.7/10. Explore the interactive map to compare communes in real time, adjust weights to your profile, and see variation at the neighbourhood scale. See the national Nature & Green Spaces page for the full ranking and methodology.

Related Guides

Data: FSO, geo.admin.ch, OSM — Scores normalised 0-10