Healthcare in Schaffhausen: best neighborhoods and areas

By VivaMap · find the best place to live in Switzerland, from canton to exact address · Last updated 26 July 2026

Map of Healthcare scores across the Schaffhausen area — top-ranked communes in green, weakest in red, per VivaMap methodology

The Healthcare criterion evaluates geographic access to care: doctors, medical centres, clinics and hospitals, weighted by type and distance. It does not reflect clinical quality — uniform across Switzerland — but physical proximity of services.

On this criterion, the Schaffhausen area performs particularly well. The average score of 7.2/10, computed across 32 communes, sits above the national average (6.5/10). Scores span from 4.6/10 to 9.7/10 across the communes analysed.

The standard deviation of 1.3 signals moderate variation between communes, enough to warrant a careful comparison.

Top 5 Communes

  1. 1. Flurlingen (ZH) 9.7/10
    outstanding score, well above the Swiss national average
  2. 2. Feuerthalen (ZH) 9.3/10
    outstanding score, well above the Swiss national average
  3. 3. Neuhausen am Rheinfall (SH) 9.0/10
    outstanding score, well above the Swiss national average
  4. 4. Diessenhofen (TG) 9.0/10
    outstanding score, well above the Swiss national average
  5. 5. Buch (SH) 8.6/10
    outstanding score, well above the Swiss national average

Bottom 5 Communes

  1. 1. Bargen (SH) 4.6/10
    solid performance, close to the Swiss average
  2. 2. Beggingen (SH) 5.3/10
    solid performance, close to the Swiss average
  3. 3. Ossingen (ZH) 5.5/10
    solid performance, close to the Swiss average
  4. 4. Neunkirch (SH) 5.9/10
    solid performance, close to the Swiss average
  5. 5. Gächlingen (SH) 5.9/10
    solid performance, close to the Swiss average

Geographic Patterns and Contrasts

The spread between the top-ranked commune (9.7/10) and the weakest (4.6/10) reaches 5.1 points. The agglomeration offers contrasting profiles without marked homogeneity.

Top-ranked communes typically benefit from several convergent factors (location, long-standing infrastructure, geographic exposure); the weakest often compound structural disadvantages. The interactive map makes these spatial clusters visible at a glance.

Who Weighs This Criterion Most

Among the four VivaMap profiles, the Retirement profile weights this criterion most heavily (weight 95 out of 100). The other profiles apply the following weights: Family (weight 70), Nature (weight 30), Young Professional (weight 20).

Practically, a high Healthcare score carries significant impact on the ranking for the Retirement profile, whereas it matters less for a profile that de-emphasises this criterion. This explains why the same commune can lead one ranking and fall mid-pack in another.

Comparison Across Swiss Agglomerations

Among the 21 major Swiss agglomerations analysed by VivaMap, Schaffhausen sits in the upper half for Healthcare — rank 8/21 (ahead of 67% of the agglomerations).

Its immediate neighbours in the ranking are Fribourg (rank 7) and Winterthur (rank 9). This context helps calibrate absolute scores: an agglomeration that looks average in isolation can sit well among its peers, and vice versa.

Key Takeaway

To prioritise Healthcare in the Schaffhausen area, Flurlingen (ZH) leads with 9.7/10. Explore the interactive map to compare communes in real time, adjust weights to your profile, and see variation at the neighbourhood scale. See the national Healthcare page for the full ranking and methodology.

Related Guides

Data: FSO, geo.admin.ch, OSM — Scores normalised 0-10