Education & Culture in Chur: best neighborhoods and areas

By VivaMap · find the best place to live in Switzerland, from canton to exact address · Last updated 9 October 2026

Map of Education & Culture scores across the Chur area: top-ranked communes in green, weakest in red, per VivaMap methodology

Education & Culture measures the density of schools, libraries, museums, theatres and playgrounds. Points come from OpenStreetMap and are distance-weighted. The criterion strongly favours urban centres with university and cultural offerings.

On this criterion, the Chur area shows average results. The average score of 7.1/10, computed across 10 communes, sits on par with the national average (6.7/10). Scores span from 4.6/10 to 9.8/10 across the communes analysed.

The standard deviation of 1.6 signals significant internal disparities: commune choice matters as much as agglomeration choice.

Top 5 Communes

  1. 1. Chur (GR) 9.8/10
    outstanding score, well above the Swiss national average
  2. 2. Domat/Ems (GR) 8.8/10
    outstanding score, well above the Swiss national average
  3. 3. Felsberg (GR) 8.5/10
    outstanding score, well above the Swiss national average
  4. 4. Zizers (GR) 8.4/10
    outstanding score, well above the Swiss national average
  5. 5. Trimmis (GR) 7.3/10
    strong performance, above the national average

Bottom 5 Communes

  1. 1. Rothenbrunnen (GR) 4.6/10
    solid performance, close to the Swiss average
  2. 2. Tamins (GR) 5.6/10
    solid performance, close to the Swiss average
  3. 3. Domleschg (GR) 5.7/10
    solid performance, close to the Swiss average
  4. 4. Churwalden (GR) 5.9/10
    solid performance, close to the Swiss average
  5. 5. Untervaz (GR) 6.2/10
    solid performance, close to the Swiss average

Geographic Patterns and Contrasts

The spread between the top-ranked commune (9.8/10) and the weakest (4.6/10) reaches 5.2 points. The agglomeration offers contrasting profiles without marked homogeneity.

Top-ranked communes typically benefit from several convergent factors (location, long-standing infrastructure, geographic exposure); the weakest often compound structural disadvantages. The interactive map makes these spatial clusters visible at a glance.

Who Weighs This Criterion Most

Among the four VivaMap profiles, the Family profile weights this criterion most heavily (weight 95 out of 100). The other profiles apply the following weights: Young Professional (weight 30), Retirement (weight 20), Nature (weight 10).

Practically, a high Education & Culture score carries significant impact on the ranking for the Family profile, whereas it matters less for a profile that de-emphasises this criterion. This explains why the same commune can lead one ranking and fall mid-pack in another.

Comparison Across Swiss Agglomerations

Among the 21 major Swiss agglomerations analysed by VivaMap, Chur sits in the lower half for Education & Culture: rank 11/21 (ahead of 52% of the agglomerations).

Its immediate neighbours in the ranking are Lausanne (rank 10) and Frauenfeld (rank 12). This context helps calibrate absolute scores: an agglomeration that looks average in isolation can sit well among its peers, and vice versa.

Key Takeaway

To prioritise Education & Culture in the Chur area, Chur (GR) leads with 9.8/10. Explore the interactive map to compare communes in real time, adjust weights to your profile, and see variation at the neighbourhood scale. See the national Education & Culture page for the full ranking and methodology.

Related Guides

Data: FSO, geo.admin.ch, OSM. Scores normalised 0-10